Difference between revisions of "Main Page/DAT"
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
see what men usage was. From example below, always the fourth one (92352484) will | see what men usage was. From example below, always the fourth one (92352484) will | ||
be the mem usage. | be the mem usage. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | In there, if we assume "nc" is approximately same as the total grids "n". | ||
+ | we have the following: | ||
+ | |||
+ | For the header: | ||
+ | (1) coordinate => 3 columns * 4 bytes | ||
+ | (2) cell data => 9 columns * 4 bytes | ||
+ | (3) cell type => 1 columns * 4 bytes | ||
+ | |||
+ | For the 8 fields: | ||
+ | 3 columns * 4 bytes | ||
+ | |||
+ | So, we have 275M*(8 fields *3*4)+ 275M*(3+9+1)*4 = 40 GB ? | ||
+ | |||
+ | Or, neglecting the cel type, we get 275M(8*3*4+12*4)=39GB ? |
Revision as of 21:31, 24 March 2012
SIZEu file
ldim: dimension
lxi: the degree of polynomials lx1: the number of grid points on the face ly1=lx1; lz1=lx1
lelt: the maximun number of element per core
lp : the maximum number of cores
We'll have to use (E,lelt,lx1,lp), to represent size of prob, instead of c3d.rea.
E=total element numbers, lelt=element # per core, lx1= grid points in one direction, lp= # of cores.
I had many different rea with c3d_6 (E=136K), c3d_7(E=273K), etc..
Even for a fixed num of element with c3d_7 (E=273K), men usage is different for different # of cores (lp=32k, 65k, 131k). So... sorry I wouldn't know which case if it's just c3d...
By the way, please remember I made huge change in the code so far for 2 times reduction in mem usage to go further up from 1.1 billion to 2.2 billion cases.
from (E=273, lx1=16, lp= 131k): limit in the past ---> (E=546k, lx1=16, lp=131k)
(E=999k, lx1=16, lp=131k) was 500M. So I couldn't do on BGP. But is be ok on XK6, even with lp=262k.
If you still keep the old version old version of the code: you can compile and
see what men usage was. From example below, always the fourth one (92352484) will
be the mem usage.
In there, if we assume "nc" is approximately same as the total grids "n".
we have the following:
For the header: (1) coordinate => 3 columns * 4 bytes (2) cell data => 9 columns * 4 bytes (3) cell type => 1 columns * 4 bytes
For the 8 fields: 3 columns * 4 bytes
So, we have 275M*(8 fields *3*4)+ 275M*(3+9+1)*4 = 40 GB ?
Or, neglecting the cel type, we get 275M(8*3*4+12*4)=39GB ?